professionaladviser_logo

FOR SUSTAINABLE, PROFITABLE, CLIENT-FOCUSED ADVISER FIRMS

pin Sign in Join
pin
    • My account
    • Sign out
  • You are currently accessing Professional Adviser via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
logo
  • logo

    Search Professional Adviser

  • News
  • More

    Choose from below

    • Features
    • Opinion
    • News Analysis
    • People Moves
    • Market Movers
    • Interviews
    • Professional Adviser TV
  • Your Business
    • Recruitment
    • Platforms
    • MPS
    • Education
    • Technology
    • Paraplanning
    • Diversity
    • Succession planning
  • Your Profession
    • Pensions
    • Investment
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Protection
    • Estate planning
    • Tax planning
    • Retirement
  • Consumer Duty
  • Events
  • About

    Authors

    • Jen Frost
    • Jenna Brown
    • Sahar Nazir
    • Isabel Baxter

    Featured Content

    • Cost of Living
    • Partner Insight
    • InvestmentIQ
    • PA360 Watchlist

    Sister publications

    • BusinessGreen
    • COVER
    • Investment Week
    • Professional Pensions

    Incisive Media

    • Our company
    • Careers
  • Searchlogo

    Search Professional Adviser

    x
Join Sign in
 
    • My account
    • Sign out
  • You are currently accessing Professional Adviser via your Enterprise account.

    If you already have an account please use the link below to sign in.

    If you have any problems with your access or would like to request an individual access account please contact our customer service team.

    Phone: +44 (0) 1858 438800

    Email: [email protected]

    • Sign in
    • Sign in

FOS

Regulation

Five reasons why the FOS must not 'name and shame'

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) is in the process of deciding how it will go about publishing its decisions, and one of the main points of contention has been whether or not it should name the firms involved.

clock 08 February 2012 •

Regulation

FSA funding levy jumps 16%, but advisers will pay less

Advice firms will pay £38.4m towards funding the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in 2012/13, the regulator proposed today.

clock 02 February 2012 •

Regulation

FOS pushes ahead with plans to name firms involved in disputes

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) looks set to hold its ground on plans to include the names of businesses involved when it starts publishing final decisions.

clock 31 January 2012 •

Regulation

PPI redress soars to new high

Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) redress totals have reached a new peak after payments rocketed by more than £100m in just one month.

clock 26 January 2012 •

Regulation

Protection complaints exceed 2011 levels

Protection complaints continued to rise during the year and have already breached last year's totals in some product areas.

clock 17 January 2012 •

Regulation

FOS complaint load swells as PPI gripes rocket

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) saw a near-60% rise in complaints relating to payment protection insurance (PPI) in the final three months of 2011.

clock 17 January 2012 •

Regulation

FOS may charge for case fees upfront

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) is been urged to consider charging a case fee before the complaint has been resolved and closed, as part of a drive for better efficiency.

clock 12 January 2012 •

Your profession

Passporting: Three things to consider

Paul Stanfield, CEO of FEIFA, outlines the key considerations for advisory firms considering passporting their businesses back into the UK from another EU state.

clock 11 January 2012 •

Regulation

AIFA: Existing regulatory structure 'unfair' on advisers

The Association of IFAs (AIFA) has pledged to use 2012 to campaign for a more comprehensive regulatory structure for advisory businesses.

clock 10 January 2012 •

Regulation

Top PPI mis-sellers face £55m costs

The ten worst offending payment protection insurance (PPI) mis-selling firms could face costs of over £55m to enable regulators to deal with the problem.

clock 06 January 2012 •
474849
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing Solutions
  • About Incisive Media
  • Privacy Settings
  • Careers
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Policies
FOLLOW US
Incisive Media

© Incisive Business Media Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR. Registered in England and Wales with company registration number 09178013. Part of Arc network, www.arc-network.com

DIGITAL PUBLISHER OF THE YEAR
right wallpaper ad
Loading.gif?page type=listing page&tag=fos