Partner Insight: From treating customers fairly, to treating customers well

Royal London's Jamie Jenkins shares insights on how The Consumer Duty is set to revolutionise the financial services industry, ushering in an era of elevated customer service standards and widespread transformations.

clock • 3 min read
Jamie Jenkins, Director of Policy and Communications at Royal London
Image:

Jamie Jenkins, Director of Policy and Communications at Royal London

The Consumer Duty will bring widespread changes across the financial services industry, raising the bar on how it serves its customers. I've previously described it as a shift from Treating Customers Fairly, to Treating Customers Well, and proving it. That phraseology seems to have resonated, as a way of summarising the evolutionary step that the Consumer Duty is intended to herald.

At its core, the Consumer Duty represents a significant cultural shift, one that should focus the minds of boards and executive teams of all regulated firms in our sector on the real-world outcomes of the customers we serve.

The current regime of ‘fairness' still applies and has served us well. But at times it leaves firms more focused on compliance than necessarily good customer outcomes. Ensuring that our interactions with a customer are compliant - while important - doesn't necessarily go far enough to help facilitate a good outcome.

This has become evident in recent years as we recognise that most people don't read small print, or necessarily take the key messages they need to know from all the disclosures we make. Knowing that we have accurately disclosed information doesn't necessarily mean that it has been understood, or acted upon, so it may not be leading to good outcomes.

This isn't about guaranteeing good outcomes for customers, but it is about taking action to help them achieve them. Ultimately, it is for customers to make their own decisions about their finances, even if they receive advice, but the industry can do more to help with this decision making, and this is perhaps where the Consumer Duty can make the biggest difference.

This is particularly true for people making retirement decisions - where we've moved from a world where many had guaranteed pensions from their Defined Benefit schemes to a position where people effectively end up with a pot of money from their Defined Contribution scheme - which they need to make last through their later years.

Imagine for a second that your employer offered to pay you an annual lump sum as a salary, instead of weekly or monthly, and it was your responsibility to make that last the whole year. Exciting as it may sound, it would be a daunting prospect.

Retirement will be like that for many people, but it's even more challenging as they have to make their money last for many years, often decades, with little certainty about how long they'll live or what their future financial needs may be.

Putting ourselves in the shoes of customers trying to make these decisions will help us understand better how we can help. It may also change the types of conversations we have with them, whether verbally or digitally. We seem to have reached a position - through successive regulation - where we spend more time warning people of the pitfalls of poor decisions rather than telling them the upside of making good ones.

While not technically part of the Consumer Duty, the forthcoming review of advice and guidance seems closely interwoven. It needs to start to reverse this trend, focusing on what we can do to help people, as opposed to scaring some people into inactivity through successive warnings about the risks involved.

The Consumer Duty should herald a more constructive approach to helping consumers, and that has to be a good thing.

 

If you're looking for support to meet the requirements, visit our Consumer Duty Hub - it's packed with guidance and resources to help you put the principles into practice.

 

This post is funded by Royal London

More on Consumer Duty

Assessment of value: Unintended Consumer Duty consequences

Assessment of value: Unintended Consumer Duty consequences

All parties now have an obligation to consider the value of their proposition

David Ogden
clock 14 June 2024 • 3 min read
Consumer Duty: How firms should prepare for the 31 July deadline

Consumer Duty: How firms should prepare for the 31 July deadline

'A discussion on what gaps exist would seem sensible'

Catriona McInally
clock 10 June 2024 • 4 min read
FCA should name firms that miss Consumer Duty report deadline

FCA should name firms that miss Consumer Duty report deadline

First Consumer Duty board report deadline is 31 July

Jenna Brown
clock 10 June 2024 • 2 min read

In-depth

Serving HNW clients: 'Advisers must take a greater deal of care'

Serving HNW clients: 'Advisers must take a greater deal of care'

‘They need bespoke strategies with the expertise of multiple advisers’

Isabel Baxter
clock 17 June 2024 • 5 min read
Editor's View: The week we have all been waiting for...manifestos!

Editor's View: The week we have all been waiting for...manifestos!

The editor's Friday Night Takeaway from 14 June

Hope Coumbe
clock 14 June 2024 • 1 min read
Multi-asset sentiment indicator: Interest up for small and mid-caps

Multi-asset sentiment indicator: Interest up for small and mid-caps

'The consensus outlook for inflation and interest rates has shifted'

Paul Ilott
clock 12 June 2024 • 8 min read