FCA's shelved name and shame policy 'deeply flawed from the outset'

The decision to drop the policy described as ‘significant development’

Sahar Nazir
clock • 2 min read

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) now shelved plan to publicly name firms under investigation faced industry backlash, with a lawyer describing it as “deeply flawed from the outset”.

The FCA today (12 March) scrapped its controversial plan to publicly name firms under investigation, marking a significant retreat from one of its most high-profile proposals. Its decision has come after industry criticism, with Kingsley Napley financial services regulatory partner Jill Lorimer saying the U-turn is "a hugely significant development". The FCA will instead maintain its current approach, which only allows for disclosure in exceptional circumstances. The regulator's decision signals a change in direction and comes as it builds focus on its secondary growth objective. "...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

FCA warns on loan notes and mini-bond investment risks

FCA warns on loan notes and mini-bond investment risks

Urges consumers to be wary of high-risk investments

Jenna Brown
clock 20 August 2026 • 2 min read
SVS Securities CEO banned and fined

SVS Securities CEO banned and fined

Demetrios Hadjigeorgiou barred from working in senior management positions

Jenna Brown
clock 20 August 2026 • 2 min read
Suitability rules overhaul: Why firms should engage now, not later

Suitability rules overhaul: Why firms should engage now, not later

'The bigger shift is philosophical, not just structural'

Marjolaine Quirke
clock 19 August 2026 • 3 min read