Advisers flag dip in number of clients ending protection policies

Comes amid a year of change for an increasingly smaller protection market

Sahar Nazir
clock • 1 min read

Over a third (36%) of advisers have seen a reduction in the number of clients who are cancelling their protection policies, according to Royal London.

Research conducted by the mutual alongside research agency Opinium last month found 36% of advisers have observed this drop in policy cancellations. Royal London pensions expert Clare Moffat said: "The last few years have been challenging for many, no matter where you may be on the ‘wealth ladder'. "The value advisers bring to a client relationship is never more important than in times of uncertainty where they can offer advice and reassurance." While client interest may be on the rise, a recent PA Asks survey found the majority of advisers do not consider protection any more impor...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Protection

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Rising demand for IHT planning

Cameron Roberts
clock 25 August 2026 • 2 min read
Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

What represents true value for the client?

Alan Lakey
clock 11 August 2026 • 3 min read
Let's talk 'triple shock': Why the protection gap starts with three dangerous assumptions

Let's talk 'triple shock': Why the protection gap starts with three dangerous assumptions

Three assumptions keeping the protection gap alive

Graham Singleton
clock 28 July 2026 • 5 min read