Government mulling further DC charge cap proposals

Could dilute cap

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 3 min read
Chancellor Rishi Sunak. Photo: UK Parliament CC BY 3.0
Image:

Chancellor Rishi Sunak. Photo: UK Parliament CC BY 3.0

The government could be considering launching yet another consultation into the defined contribution (DC) charge cap in order to direct cash into the government’s “levelling up” agenda.

The Financial Times reported the government was working on proposals to dilute the 0.75% ceiling on annual management fees in a bid to get schemes to invest more in long-term projects such as infrastructure schemes, renewable energy projects and innovative tech firms - investments commonly managed by private equity and venture capital firms, which often charge fees higher than the charge cap.

The article continued to note that performance fees would not be removed from the charge cap in their entirety, however, and any consultation would "seek a balance" that encouraged investment in illiquid assets with the potential for greater return.

This comes after the government has conducted a string of reviews into the charge cap and investment in illiquid investments over recent years.

In February 2019, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) launched a consultation on the consideration of illiquid assets and the development of scale in occupational DC schemes.

Last June, the DWP launched a review into the default fund charge cap - a review which concluded in January this year with it deciding not to make any changes at the current time.

As part of its Spring Budget, published on 3 March, the Treasury said it would consult again on DC investments - saying it wanted to encourage schemes to invest in "high-growth companies" and would seek to make it easier to do so under the auto-enrolment (AE) charge cap of 0.75%.

In its Plan for Growth, the government said it wanted to remove disincentives for institutional investors, particularly DC schemes, to investing in a broader range of assets.

Following this, on 19 March, the DWP launched a consultation on how to incorporate performance fees within the charge cap.

The DWP's response to both its February 2019 and March 2021 consultations were published this summer (21 June) - a response which brought forward measures to, among other things, amend regulations to better enable schemes to pay performance fees, rule changes that came into force earlier this month.

This comes on top of work done by other bodies - including the Productive Finance Working Group, which published a report in September putting forward a number of recommendations on DC investment one of which looked at widening access to less liquid assets.

Fundamental issues

Cardano UK chief executive Kerrin Rosenberg said it was "encouraging" the government was considering how it can better incentivise pensions funds to invest in its 'levelling up' agenda but said there were challenges.

He said: "One fundamental issue is the extent to which trustees can hold unlisted investments. Most ‘levelling-up' assets such as large infrastructure projects are private, and require a long-term time frame. This is where UK pension funds are more challenged.

"The DC market seems to have converged to market practice that demands daily liquidity. This is done to allow members a choice, at all times, to switch their investments to another provider. Most trustees of DC schemes insist, therefore, that all assets are fully liquid and have a daily price. This is crazy, as most DC members will not be transferring the pensions and some exposure to illiquid assets could meet their long-term investment needs well."

Rosenberg added: "Dropping daily liquidity, pricing requirements and other impediments such as the very tight cap in investment costs imposed on AE schemes, could unlock a significant pool of funding. Illiquid investments typically come at a higher cost than their more liquid comparatives, which is not to say that these charge caps should be raised for all investments, liquid investments can be done at much lower costs.

"But if governments could incentivise a portion of clients' portfolios that could bear illiquidity and higher fees, that would be very helpful to those considering investing in ‘levelling-up' projects."

More on Pensions

Rachel Vahey: "In introducing this the Department for Work and Pensions has had to walk a fine line. The regulations have to be flexible enough to allow the ‘good transfers' to go ahead; they cannot risk bringing the transfer market to a standstill."

Rachel Vahey: Walking a fine line on DB transfer restrictions

In force from 30 November

Rachel Vahey
clock 02 December 2021 • 3 min read
Richard Jones: Helping clients with small DB schemes face ESG challenge

Richard Jones: Helping clients with small DB schemes face ESG challenge

ESG policy ramping up

Richard Jones
clock 02 December 2021 • 3 min read
Clara chief executive Adam Saron.

Clara becomes first DB superfund to get approval

18 months after interim regime launched

James Phillips
clock 30 November 2021 • 2 min read

In-depth

Problem providers: Stick or twist for the sake of your firm's efficiency?

Problem providers: Stick or twist for the sake of your firm's efficiency?

Months for responses

Hannah Godfrey
clock 22 November 2021 • 7 min read
Financial coaching: Is this the next avenue for advice firms?

Financial coaching: Is this the next avenue for advice firms?

'Big in 10 years'

Hannah Godfrey
clock 09 November 2021 • 6 min read
Advising business owners: Who 'owns' the SME client relationship?

Advising business owners: Who 'owns' the SME client relationship?

Relationships built on trust

Jenna Brown
clock 21 October 2021 • 7 min read