'A balanced portfolio is a dangerous thing to hold right now' - Ruffer's Matt Smith

'Lower than ever reward'

Sophie King
clock • 1 min read

Ruffer investment director Matt Smith has told advisers he believes that balanced portfolios are a dangerous thing to be invested in at this point in the economic cycle.

Speaking at Professional Adviser's latest working lunch event on Wednesday (14 April), Smith said balanced portfolios have duration risk on both sides of the equation. "The bond portfolio has more duration risk than ever before, for lower reward than ever before," he said. "But the equity part of your portfolio also has very significant duration risk because of the degree to which investors have re-rated growth stocks in particular, which account for a larger percentage of the market than ever before." Smith said it was "low and stable inflation" that had permitted this. "Irrespect...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Your profession

News editor's view: 40s are the new 50s - a move in the right direction? 

News editor's view: 40s are the new 50s - a move in the right direction? 

The news editor's Friday Night Takeaway from 1 May

Isabel Baxter
clock 01 May 2026 • 3 min read
Feel Good Friday: FOS chooses Dementia UK as charity partner

Feel Good Friday: FOS chooses Dementia UK as charity partner

Will support Dementia UK over the next two years

Professional Adviser
clock 01 May 2026 • 1 min read
Why 50:50 parenting doesn't necessarily mean no child maintenance

Why 50:50 parenting doesn't necessarily mean no child maintenance

'In many cases, one parent will meet a greater share of the children’s financial needs'

Clizia Motterle
clock 01 May 2026 • 4 min read