Solicitor Gareth Fatchett looks at the Kession decision which he says could reshape risk across financial promotion and AR structures
The Supreme Court decision in Kession Capital v KVB Consultants may emerge as one of the most commercially significant developments for financial promotion firms and appointed representative (AR) structures in recent years. Not because it fundamentally rewrites the law, but because it alters where firms now understand regulatory and commercial risk to sit. For many years, large parts of the market operated on an implicit assumption: where regulated activity was introduced, distributed, or facilitated through an AR structure, liability would ultimately flow back to the principal firm. ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes





