LV= panel initially rejected Bain Capital deal in favour of Royal London bid

Execs sought further reassurances

Tom Ellis
clock • 2 min read

A panel representing holders of LV= with-profits policies initially rejected the £530m Bain Capital deal for the insurance mutual.

According to The Times, that committee only ended its resistance to Bain Capital's deal after LV= executives went back to the private equity firm to secure further reassurances that the representatives of with-profits holders. The newspaper reported that it was still not clear whether the committee approves of the deal. The insurer said that, as a result of the deal, the capital available for distribution is expected to increase by up to 40% - capital which will be used to increase payments to with-profits members. Sale to Bain Capital gives LV= opportunity 'to accelerate growth' I...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Pensions

'Caution' required over potential use of pensions for house deposits

'Caution' required over potential use of pensions for house deposits

Research finds the number of retirees living in rented property could treble by 2040

Martin Richmond
clock 23 January 2026 • 4 min read
Hidden 'systemic barriers' perpetuate gender pensions gap

Hidden 'systemic barriers' perpetuate gender pensions gap

Entrenched barriers, not lack of financial confidence to blame

Jenna Brown
clock 23 January 2026 • 3 min read
Mind the (widening) gender pensions gap

Mind the (widening) gender pensions gap

‘A terrifying outcome for women in retirement’

Caitlin Southall
clock 14 January 2026 • 4 min read