Advisers question MiFID II reporting rule

Unclear where responsibility lies

Victoria McKeever
clock • 3 min read

Advisers have questioned whether the incoming MiFID II rule requiring a client to be notified when their investment falls, will be of use to the client and worth the cost of implementation.

The new rule, due to be implemented as part of the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) regulation in January 2018, means clients have to be notified within 24 hours if their portfolio falls by 10% or more. Speaking at a roundtable hosted by Smith & Williamson, Delta Financial Management director Jarrod Ellis said: "Firstly we need to consider what the cost will be to put a system in place to notify clients of any drops. Secondly, considering a 10% drop has happened just four times since the war, is it actually of benefit to notify clients after the event has happ...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Verve flags adviser hesitance over compliance switching

Verve flags adviser hesitance over compliance switching

Launches guide

Jen Frost
clock 06 February 2026 • 2 min read
Failed financial advice firms tracker

Failed financial advice firms tracker

Firms that the FSCS has confirmed as failed since the start of 2023

Professional Adviser
clock 06 February 2026 • 1 min read
Navigating FCA skilled person reviews, remediation, and past business reviews

Navigating FCA skilled person reviews, remediation, and past business reviews

Risk of s166 review has 'never been more significant'

Marjolaine Quirke
clock 05 February 2026 • 2 min read