Baillie Gifford cuts fees on duo of investment trusts

'Taking the initiative on transparency'

Natalie Kenway
clock • 2 min read

Baillie Gifford has cut the investment management fees on two of its investment trusts, as charges on closed-ended structures come under increasing scrutiny.

The Edinburgh-based has announced it will be introducing a new layer to the tiered fee structure of the £422m Baillie Gifford Japan Trust and £271.8m Edinburgh Worldwide Investment Trust based on their net assets.

Boards on both trusts have agreed an annual management fee of 0.95% on the first £50m of net assets and 0.65% on net assets above £50m, with an additional tier of 0.55% introduced on net assets above £250m. Fees will continue to be calculated and levied at the end of each quarter. 

James Budden (pictured), director of retail marketing and distribution at Baillie Gifford, said: "The investment trust industry has to take the initiative if it wants to compete in the new world of transparency and clarity of costs for investors.

"There is an opportunity for the boards of trusts and managers to work together to grow assets under management and drive down fees for the end investor.

"This move highlights our ongoing commitment to the long-term future of the investment trusts we manage. We already have one of the most attractive fee levels for Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust, the £4bn global investment trust, and by taking advantage of economies of scale there is an attractive opportunity to reduce costs and remain competitive."

Previously the AMC for both the Japan Trust and Edinburgh Worldwide trust was calculated at 0.95% on the first £50m of net assets and 0.65% on the remainder.

This follows a number of moves in the investment trust industry as the focus on charges in active management spreads from the open-ended sector.

When Neil Woodford launched his Patient Capital investment trust last year, Woodford Investment Management said it would only charge 0.1% to cover the bare minimum of costs, with no other recurring charges, but it would take a performance fee when the fund delivers in excess of 10% per annum (subject to a high watermark), something which it has not returned in its first year.

Additionally, the Baring Emerging Europe Trust scrapped its performance fee earlier this year, while the way the management fee was calculated on the Lindsell Train investment trust was adjusted in March so that the NAV of the investment company is used as a reference.

More on Investment

Why 'bubble talk' doesn't always burst markets

Why 'bubble talk' doesn't always burst markets

What’s really driving recent returns?

Eleanor Ingilby
clock 20 November 2025 • 4 min read
Consultancy launches to provide IFAs with 'robust' investment processes

Consultancy launches to provide IFAs with 'robust' investment processes

Sheridan Admans launches Infundly

Isabel Baxter
clock 06 November 2025 • 1 min read
Inflation protection not front of mind for financial advisers

Inflation protection not front of mind for financial advisers

Titan Square Mile report suggests

Jen Frost
clock 04 November 2025 • 3 min read

In-depth

The 'stark' impact of tax and pensions changes on special needs families

The 'stark' impact of tax and pensions changes on special needs families

Among hardest hit by ‘poorly consulted’ reforms

Jen Frost
clock 27 October 2025 • 8 min read
Reeves' rumoured ISA reforms risk 'harm' and diversification issues

Reeves' rumoured ISA reforms risk 'harm' and diversification issues

Concerns over rumoured £10k cash ISA cap and potential UK equity mandate

Sahar Nazir
clock 22 October 2025 • 5 min read
Rumoured Evelyn/RBC deal would turbocharge market share but large mergers 'notoriously complex'

Rumoured Evelyn/RBC deal would turbocharge market share but large mergers 'notoriously complex'

Sale ‘no surprise’ after Evelyn’s fund and professional services business offload

Isabel Baxter
clock 20 October 2025 • 6 min read