Why pay more for active fund management?

clock • 4 min read

With only one third of all active managers outperforming their respective indices, according to Morningstar data, investors are quite rightly asking why they should pay more for active fund management.

The answer is that if you choose the right active fund manager, the gains you can make far outweigh the costs. Take the top 10 active funds in the IMA UK All Companies sector over the past 10 years. As the chart below shows they have hugely outperformed the FTSE All-Share Index, returning 117.7% on average compared with just 26.9% from the index.

Passive investing, through index ‘tracker' funds or exchange-traded funds, has become popular in recent years with some investors, although active funds still far outnumber them. Called ‘passive' because no thinking is required, they aim simply to track the performance of an index. They provide a cheap and easy way of investing in the stockmarket, and with no risk of seriously underperforming the market.

But as we can see when the average passive fund is added to the chart, you get a very average return - just 16.0% over the 10 years, but slightly below the index due mainly to the fees paid.

active-and-passive-returns2

The key to substantially higher returns over the long term is independent thinking - informed, rational decision-making about companies and their prospects. What you pay for with active management fees is the expertise of an investment professional skilled in spotting inefficiencies in the market and taking advantage of those through effective stock selection.

Why be a slave to the market? The market is inefficient - it mis-prices companies. The good can be cheap and the bad, even the ugly, can be expensive. Passive investors are forced to hold the few large stocks and sectors that dominate market indices. This can sometimes lead to the heaviest losses, such as those from the banks that weighed heavily in the FTSE 100 Index during 2008. This concentration in certain stocks and sectors can be extremely risky.

Costly, too! When the index rebalances, trackers are forced to sell departing stocks (at their cheapest), and to buy those that are entering (at their most expensive). Would you do that in any other business?

Unlike passive funds, actively managed funds are not tied to stock or sector weightings determined by an index. The manager can take informed investment decisions on companies and sectors, and go where he/she sees the best valuation opportunities. They have the flexibility to quickly react to changing market conditions and, for example, move out of poorly performing companies to preserve value during falling markets.

Also, they can look at the bigger picture - to decide which are the key themes and structural shifts in economies or consumer behaviour that have major investment potential. They can focus on the fastest-growing parts of the world, like China and India - either directly in local companies, or indirectly, in Western companies operating in these regions. There is a wide variety of active funds covering many investment goals and risk profiles to suit most investors.

But not all active funds are equal. In a population of around 5,000 active funds available in the UK, how do you go about picking one who will consistently outperform?

It's all about making an informed choice. Successful active fund managers have a number of things in common - the discipline and patience to invest for the long term, the experience of seeing all types of market conditions, the resources to make the right stock selection decisions, and the freedom to develop their individual strategies and back their conviction.

Look for an active fund manager with proven ability to outperform the market, one with a consistent track record, and who is independently recognised.

No one has ever said that finding a good active fund manager is easy. However, by putting in the same time and effort as you would into any other major purchase in your life, the results can be extremely rewarding. So why pay more for active fund management? We would argue that you cannot afford not to because the good ones are worth their weight in gold.

For Financial Advisers only. Not for onward distribution. No other persons should rely on any information contained within this article. Source of performance: Morningstar, Inc., IMA UK All Companies sector as at 26.02.10. Figures in GBP, bid-bid with net income reinvested, basic rate taxpayer. Average performance of passive funds based on the 32 passive funds in the sector with a 10 year track record. This Financial Promotion is issued by M&G Securities Limited which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and provides investment products. The registered office is Laurence Pountney Hill, London, EC4R 0HH. Registered in England No. 90776.

 

More on Investment

Partner Insight: Debt, deficits, and market resilience: Is your portfolio prepared?

Partner Insight: Debt, deficits, and market resilience: Is your portfolio prepared?

The world is awash in debt. In the US, government borrowing has surged past 100% of GDP, and the fiscal deficit is at a level typically seen in wartime. Other major economies are in similar situations. So, what does this deluge of debt mean for markets?

Orbis Investments
clock 15 May 2025 • 5 min read
Three Invesco funds fail to deliver value to investors

Three Invesco funds fail to deliver value to investors

Manager's annual assessment found some poor performance

clock 14 May 2025 • 2 min read
Darius McDermott: Old demographics, new innovations — so why isn't healthcare booming?

Darius McDermott: Old demographics, new innovations — so why isn't healthcare booming?

'The sector should be flying — but it isn't'

Darius McDermott
clock 08 May 2025 • 5 min read

In-depth

Sudden departures and a government review – what next for the FOS?

Sudden departures and a government review – what next for the FOS?

A look at the Ombudsman’s roadmap to modernisation

Isabel Baxter
clock 07 April 2025 • 6 min read
Advisers avoid 'knee-jerk' dismissal of US equities amid Trump's tariff shake-up

Advisers avoid 'knee-jerk' dismissal of US equities amid Trump's tariff shake-up

‘Although many market values have fallen, the fundamentals remain largely intact’

Isabel Baxter
clock 03 April 2025 • 5 min read
'A divisive and difficult topic': Advice firms on DE&I progress

'A divisive and difficult topic': Advice firms on DE&I progress

Industry shares thoughts on regulator’s adjustments

Isabel Baxter
clock 31 March 2025 • 6 min read