Think tank brands FOS 'unfit for purpose' in damning report

Questions over fairness

Jenna Brown
clock • 3 min read

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has been branded unfit for purpose in a scathing report from the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) which questions the fairness of its decisions and says the organisation is failing consumers.

The think tank's report said the FOS needs "major reform" and is not meeting its primary objectives of providing fair and reasonable dispute resolution at speed. It also said it was not good value for money and failed to meet its aim of "supporting competition and consumer welfare". Chief executive and chief ombudsman Caroline Wayman resigned from the service earlier this month after seven years leading the FOS. The IEA said she stepped down amid a mounting backlog of "complaints and controversy over levels of compensation".   It added new leadership would be unlikely to change its pr...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Advisers warned against 'cost-saving' exercises as FCA proposes ditching annual suitability requirement

Advisers warned against 'cost-saving' exercises as FCA proposes ditching annual suitability requirement

Changes offer an opportunity for more ‘meaningful’ advice

Sophia Panayi
clock 26 March 2026 • 4 min read
FSCS unveils five-year strategy

FSCS unveils five-year strategy

Three core focus areas

Jen Frost
clock 26 March 2026 • 2 min read
AR reforms: Who really pays when things go wrong?

AR reforms: Who really pays when things go wrong?

'It's not enough for the AR to hold its own cover. The obligation sits with the principal'

Jonathan Newell
clock 24 March 2026 • 8 min read