Firms can 'make a judgement' about when pure protection services are associated with investment advice as the FSA settles on a more relaxed disclosure regime under COBS.
Setting out its final transparency rules for investment advisers arranging pure protection contracts, the regulator also says that where an adviser charge has been agreed more than 12 months prior to the protection service, the rules do not apply as the services are "unlikely" to be associated. Otherwise, the FSA confirms proposals set out more than a year ago: that advisers who arrange a pure protection contract alongside investment advice must "in good time" ensure the client understands how the firm was remunerated for the protection element, including commission received. Last ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes