Park Row ordered to redress £7.8m to customers

clock

Park Row must redress customers up to £7.8m for failing to ensure its sales were suitable, the FSA has announced.

The firm's former CEO, Peter Sprung, has been fined £49,000 and has agreed not to perform a significant function for five years. The FSA says it identified serious failings at the national IFA network between January 2007 and January 2009. Park Row has been publicly censured and will have to begin a customer redress exercise, which could cost between £5m and £7.8m.  As Park Row is currently being wound-down, redress was secured with the support of its parent company, Royal Liver Assurance. An FSA investigation found the firm failed to ensure its advisers properly documented the sui...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Your profession

Professional Adviser journalist wins Headlinemoney award

Professional Adviser journalist wins Headlinemoney award

Prestigious awards celebrate financial services journalism excellence

Professional Adviser
clock 18 July 2025 • 1 min read
PA Digital Working Lunch: Baillie Gifford on the compelling UK opportunity

PA Digital Working Lunch: Baillie Gifford on the compelling UK opportunity

Join PA and Baillie Gifford online next Wednesday

Professional Adviser
clock 18 July 2025 • 1 min read
'Will this return us to one-size-fits-all?': Industry divided over Reeves' Consumer Duty wholesale review

'Will this return us to one-size-fits-all?': Industry divided over Reeves' Consumer Duty wholesale review

Wholesale exemption would ‘adversely affect the Duty’s objectives’

Sahar Nazir
clock 17 July 2025 • 5 min read