The Association of IFAs says the FSA has got it wrong on the issue of prudential requirements and their apparent effect on the behaviour of adviser firms.
The association says there are examples elsewhere in the financial industry which prove prudential rules are not necessarily an effective incentive for firms to reduce the frequency of mis-selling. The FSA yesterday published a discussion paper on mis-selling across the advice industry suggesting, among other things, that adviser firms meet the costs of claims made against them out of their own cash rather than via the FSCS. The paper suggests prudential requirements should focus on reducing the risk of a firm causing detriment to consumers, and other firms paying the FSCS levy, by mis-...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes



