FCA puts focus on WealthTek criminal investigation

Regulator secured 12-month pause on civil action

Jenna Brown
clock • 2 min read

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has paused its civil action against WealthTek as it focuses on investigating suspected criminal offences by the discretionary fund manager’s (DFM) owner John Dance.

The regulator said on 1 March that it applied to a High Court judge to secure a year-long pause in its civil case over "serious regulatory breaches" at the DFM. It will now instead focus on investigating suspected criminal offences by Dance. A statement said: "The investigation into suspected criminal offences in respect of WealthTek and Dance continues. Progress in that investigation has led us to focus our resources on the suspected criminal offences. The option to restart our civil case remains open to the FCA." It added that the restraint order granted on 8 November last year f...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Advisers warned against 'cost-saving' exercises as FCA proposes ditching annual suitability requirement

Advisers warned against 'cost-saving' exercises as FCA proposes ditching annual suitability requirement

Changes offer an opportunity for more ‘meaningful’ advice

Sophia Panayi
clock 26 March 2026 • 4 min read
FSCS unveils five-year strategy

FSCS unveils five-year strategy

Three core focus areas

Jen Frost
clock 26 March 2026 • 2 min read
AR reforms: Who really pays when things go wrong?

AR reforms: Who really pays when things go wrong?

'It's not enough for the AR to hold its own cover. The obligation sits with the principal'

Jonathan Newell
clock 24 March 2026 • 8 min read