PLSA blasts DWP for failure to heed FCL increase concern

Some AE schemes face £5m a year levy rise

Jonathan Stapleton
clock • 2 min read
The PLSA's Joe Dabrowski said he was 'disappointed' the government had ignored industry concerns
Image:

The PLSA's Joe Dabrowski said he was 'disappointed' the government had ignored industry concerns

The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) has expressed its “disappointment” after the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) confirmed huge increases in the fraud compensation levy (FCL).

The Fraud Compensation Fund (FCF) is operated by the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) and aims to provide compensation to eligible occupational pension schemes where there has been scheme asset reduction attributable to an offence involving dishonesty and where the employer has become insolvent or is unlikely to continue as a going concern.

The cost of this is met through the FCL - a levy which is paid by qualifying schemes.

In 2020, a High Court ruling (Board of the PPF v Dalriada Trustees) clarified that pension liberation schemes were eligible to make a claim on the FCF if they satisfied specified criteria.

There were insufficient assets within the FCF to meet claims arising from this judgment and the DWP said it would make a loan to the PPF - one that is expected to cover 126 schemes and total approximately £250m over the period to 2025.

As a result, the DWP launched a review of the FCL ceiling in order to allow the PPF to set the FCL at levels that will enable it to repay the loan the government intends to provide by 2030/31.

Current regulations set the maximum charge for the FCL at 75p per member for all eligible schemes barring master trusts, where the maximum is currently 30p per member.

The review recommended these amounts be increased to 65p per member for master trusts and £1.80 per member for other eligible schemes.

In its response to the review yesterday (10 March), the government confirmed these increases from the 2022/23 levy year.

The PLSA said the government had "repeatedly" failed to listen to the industry's concerns over the levy increase.

Deputy director of policy Joe Dabrowski said, while the trade body "fully supports" victims of pension scams being fairly compensated, it was "vital" we had an effective regime to protect members and ensure they are compensated when victims of dishonest behaviours.

He said: "The new rates confirmed by the government for 2022/23 will amount to a more than £5m per annum increase for some schemes, give very little notice to schemes and - because they ask automatic enrolment master trusts to pay a disproportionate amount in contributions - will ultimately see the costs borne unfairly by savers with the lowest balances.

"The PLSA has repeatedly argued that the fraud compensation regime is not fit for purpose and requested a one-year delay to the levy hike to allow time for a proper review to build a more robust and future-proofed compensation regime that offers protection for all pension savers."

Dabrowski added: "We are disappointed the government has seen fit to ignore these concerns and follow through with the unfair increase, despite near universal opposition among respondents."

More on Pensions

Majority of self-employed women fail to assess maternity leave/retirement impact

Majority of self-employed women fail to assess maternity leave/retirement impact

Just 18% said they had completed detailed planning on mat leave financial impact

Jenna Brown
clock 09 March 2026 • 2 min read
Everything advisers need to know about using a DB SSAS

Everything advisers need to know about using a DB SSAS

A DB SSAS operates using the regulatory framework as traditional DB pension arrangements

Caitlin Southall
clock 06 March 2026 • 4 min read
Pension transfer times got faster in 2025

Pension transfer times got faster in 2025

Transfer times took 10.2 days to complete on average, Origo finds

Jasmine Urquhart
clock 05 March 2026 • 1 min read

In-depth

What does the Schroders/Nuveen deal mean for Benchmark advisers?

What does the Schroders/Nuveen deal mean for Benchmark advisers?

ARs await deal impact amid future sale suggestions

Isabel Baxter
clock 26 February 2026 • 5 min read
The adviser firms private equity wants in 2026

The adviser firms private equity wants in 2026

'People-led durability is now the premium asset in 2026'

Laura Miller
clock 16 February 2026 • 7 min read
Onshore bonds are back – but who is leading the call for their return?

Onshore bonds are back – but who is leading the call for their return?

'Innovation, as ever in financial services, starts by looking in the rear-view mirror'

clock 11 February 2026 • 5 min read