Carey Pensions ombudsman ruling contradicts High Court judgment

Decision one month before Court judgment

clock • 4 min read

Carey Pensions has been asked to compensate a client who lost out from the same investment involved in the landmark High Court case against the self-invested personal pension (SIPP) provider.

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) heard that a Carey client, known as Mr A to retain his anonymity, transferred his defined contribution pension valued at £40,000 into a SIPP through Carey in March 2012. When Mr A's SIPP dropped in value he accused Carey, which has since been rebranded Options Pensions, of not conducting proper due diligence and failing to meet its obligations as an authorised firm. Carey used Spain-based introducer CL&P to facilitate investments on Mr A's behalf into storage facility Store First and Global Agricultural Services (GAS) Verdant Australian farmland. ...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Your profession

The banks are back: What does this mean for advisers?

The banks are back: What does this mean for advisers?

Banks ‘uniquely positioned’ to provide advice to mass market

Sophia Panayi
clock 24 August 2026 • 6 min read
Social media investment advice leaves investors out of pocket - research

Social media investment advice leaves investors out of pocket - research

Over half who acted on social media financial advice regretted it

Isabel Baxter
clock 21 August 2026 • 3 min read
New sexual harassment duty: Can adviser firms show they've taken 'all reasonable steps'?

New sexual harassment duty: Can adviser firms show they've taken 'all reasonable steps'?

'Employers will be expected to take all reasonable steps'

Emily Bradshaw
clock 19 August 2026 • 4 min read