Firm to pay redress to insistent client following SIPP transfer

Investment in unregulated scheme

Sophie King
clock • 3 min read

Chartergroup Financial Management (CGFM) has been asked to pay redress to an insistent client who was unsuitably advised to transfer his pension to a SIPP and invest in an unregulated carbon credit scheme.

Mr T - as referred to by the ombudsman - complained CGFM gave him unsuitable advice to transfer his pensions to a self-invested personal pension (SIPP) scheme and then to invest in carbon credits - permits which allow a country or organisation to produce a certain amount of carbon emissions and which can be traded if the full allowance is not used. The complainant, who was a member of a defined benefit occupational pension scheme, transferred the value of his final salary benefits to a SIPP in 2013. When Mr T made a complaint to CGFM, which the firm did not uphold and said it advised him...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

FCA CEO sets out shift in regulator's approach with 'less rules'

FCA CEO sets out shift in regulator's approach with 'less rules'

Consumer Duty ‘will do a lot of the work for us’

Isabel Baxter
clock 18 February 2026 • 2 min read
Failed financial advice firms tracker

Failed financial advice firms tracker

Firms that the FSCS has confirmed as failed since the start of 2023

Professional Adviser
clock 17 February 2026 • 1 min read
Duty of care: Moving the needle from compliance to strategy

Duty of care: Moving the needle from compliance to strategy

'Prioritising vulnerable customers should no longer be seen as an overhead'

Jonathan Barrett
clock 10 February 2026 • 4 min read