FCA refuses to be 'less conservative' on personal recommendations

Follows FAMR consultation

Victoria McKeever
clock • 2 min read

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said it could not be "less conservative" in changing the perimeters of what constituted a personal recommendation in financial advice.

In Policy Statement PS18/3, the regulator provided feedback to responses received to the proposals it made in a consultation on the Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR), regarding perimeter guidance on personal recommendations for retail investments. The consultation paper, which was published in August, saw the FCA propose guidance should fall under the Principles of Business, the client's best interest rule, and the fair, clear and not misleading rule. In the new paper, the regulator said it had been asked: "Could the FCA take a less conservative approach to the assessment of what ...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Advisers warned against 'cost-saving' exercises as FCA proposes ditching annual suitability requirement

Advisers warned against 'cost-saving' exercises as FCA proposes ditching annual suitability requirement

Changes offer an opportunity for more ‘meaningful’ advice

Sophia Panayi
clock 26 March 2026 • 4 min read
FSCS unveils five-year strategy

FSCS unveils five-year strategy

Three core focus areas

Jen Frost
clock 26 March 2026 • 2 min read
AR reforms: Who really pays when things go wrong?

AR reforms: Who really pays when things go wrong?

'It's not enough for the AR to hold its own cover. The obligation sits with the principal'

Jonathan Newell
clock 24 March 2026 • 8 min read