FCA plans set to make firms think twice before advising outside PII

Provider contribution idea welcomed

Hannah Godfrey
clock • 4 min read

The regulator's plans for advice firms to hold cash reserves if conducting business outside their professional indemnity insurance (PII) cover will push firms to evaluate which products they use, advisers have said.

Informed Choice managing director and IFA Martin Bamford said the proposal from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could act as a disincentive against recommending non-standard products not covered by PII. "I don't think people would get involved in selling products that are not covered by PII if they knew they had to put extra capital aside," he said. "Part of me isn't a huge fan of the idea, though, because we already have PI insurance, capital adequacy and the FSCS [Financial Services Compensation Scheme]. To create a fourth layer feels like an unnecessary cost - and that cost a...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

FCA warns on loan notes and mini-bond investment risks

FCA warns on loan notes and mini-bond investment risks

Urges consumers to be wary of high-risk investments

Jenna Brown
clock 20 August 2026 • 2 min read
SVS Securities CEO banned and fined

SVS Securities CEO banned and fined

Demetrios Hadjigeorgiou barred from working in senior management positions

Jenna Brown
clock 20 August 2026 • 2 min read
Suitability rules overhaul: Why firms should engage now, not later

Suitability rules overhaul: Why firms should engage now, not later

'The bigger shift is philosophical, not just structural'

Marjolaine Quirke
clock 19 August 2026 • 3 min read