The decision of the Upper Tribunal in the case of Dunne may prove to be one of the most significant recent setbacks for the FCA in the field of enforcement litigation, writes lawyer Gareth Fatchett
In January 2026, the Upper Tribunal ruled that it would be "unfair" to admit certain Financial Conduct Authority witness evidence as expert evidence because the witness was conflicted. Although the Tribunal later admitted parts of the material as factual evidence, the ruling nevertheless strikes at a central pillar of many FCA enforcement cases: reliance upon specialist expert opinion to establish regulatory breaches. Litigation The Dunne/Fenech litigation arose from pension transfer advice provided between 2015 and 2017. The FCA alleged that the applicants had operated a flawed "t...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes




