Advisers must contribute to FSCS - Ken Davy

Creates 'halo effect' of responsibility

Victoria McKeever
clock • 2 min read

SimplyBiz chairman Ken Davy said while the current FSCS funding model posed a 'grotesque unfairness' for advisers, it was right advisers should be contributing to the levy.

In SimplyBiz's 'Advice Show' webinar streamed live on 13 March, Davy (pictured) reiterated the points raised in his response to the regulator's consultation paper in October 2016. He said the current model, whereby advisers pay the largest contribution to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) levy, was a "grotesque unfairness". Nevertheless, he argued it still made sense for advisers to continue contributing to the cost of running the compensation scheme, as it benefited the sector in creating a "halo effect" of responsibility. In December, the regulator proposed product p...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Your profession

Roger Brosch: Advice should also mean investing in your memory bank

Roger Brosch: Advice should also mean investing in your memory bank

Financial advice is never about the money itself

Roger Brosch
clock 27 August 2026 • 3 min read
Advice JVs: Why professional services tie-ups are moving beyond referrals

Advice JVs: Why professional services tie-ups are moving beyond referrals

Firms look to joint brand relationships

Isabel Baxter
clock 27 August 2026 • 6 min read
The banks are back: What does this mean for advisers?

The banks are back: What does this mean for advisers?

Banks ‘uniquely positioned’ to provide advice to mass market

Sophia Panayi
clock 24 August 2026 • 6 min read