Advice firm ordered to repay £7k fee to unhappy client

clock

An IFA has been ordered to repay a £7,400 upfront fee it received from a client who subsequently felt its recommendations were inappropriate, following a final decision from the ombudsman.

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) ruled Chiltern Consultancy should reimburse the £7,392 fee plus interest to the unnamed client, as well as a total of £250 for inconvenience and distress caused, including by failing to provide promised advice on inheritance tax (IHT). The FOS ruling related to advice given to the client, a ‘Mrs A', by Chiltern in 2012. It charged 2% of her existing holdings, plus an annual charge, for recommending the transfer of her investments from her discretionary manager (DFM) to a platform to help meet her strong preference for ethical solutions. But aft...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

News editor's view: Simplified advice added to the advice/guidance menu

News editor's view: Simplified advice added to the advice/guidance menu

The news editor's Friday Night Takeaway from 27 March

Isabel Baxter
clock 27 March 2026 • 4 min read
FCA consults on increased fees amid AI plans

FCA consults on increased fees amid AI plans

Regulator proposes to raise minimum and flat fees by 1%

Sophia Panayi
clock 26 March 2026 • 3 min read
FCA looks to drop annual suitability review requirement for ongoing advice services

FCA looks to drop annual suitability review requirement for ongoing advice services

Regulator pushes for ‘periodic’ assessments instead

Isabel Baxter
clock 25 March 2026 • 2 min read