A High Court judge has ordered that a decision notice issued by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) against a banker be quashed after a successful judicial review.
The notice, issued in October 2010, proposed to censure the banker and fine him £100,000 for failures during the financial crisis of 2008, specifically a breach of Principle 6, which requires "due skill, care and diligence in managing the business of the firm for which he is responsible". However, the banker argued it should be quashed because the FSA's Regulatory Decisions Committee (RDC) had failed to give proper or adequate reasons for its decision, in breach of its duty to do so. Although the FSA contended that the banker had alternative remedy available to him, in the form of an ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes