The FSCS decided to allocate Keydata compensation claims to the investment intermediation sub-class before consulting the industry and ignored calls for a review into its decision, a court heard today.
The claim was made during a judicial review hearing this morning in Birmingham into why £33m of an £80m interim levy was charged by the FSCS to its D2 sub-class in March 2010, following the failure of Keydata almost a year earlier. Anthony Speaight QC, acting on behalf of Regulatory Legal and for ABS Financial and others, dismissed a statement by the FSCS in December 2009 in which it said it had "considered carefully" which sub-class to put Keydata in after detailed discussions with industry representatives. The court heard how, in the months following the FSCS's announcement, AIFA an...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes