Scottish Equitbale has raised concerns about a lack of understanding among intermediaries over what can and should be put into a self-invested personal pension (Sipp).
Among its concerns, the life insurer says too few intermediaries appear aware of the complex tax implications of putting a second home into a Sipp. Scottish Equitable is warning intermediaries must be much more aware of the rules regarding residential property investment where sipps are concerned. Rachel Vahey, pensions development manager at Scottish Equitable warns consumers could find themselves with a hefty "benefit in kind" tax bill if they put a second home in a sipp and are unable to prove they have made significant efforts to ensure regular rental payments are paid into the Si...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

