An offer of extra commission by one provider has raised a question in the insurance industry: should protection have come under RDR after all?
Fairly or not, thanks to a certain FSA-led review the word ‘commission’ has become synonymous with the word ‘bias’. This is because the FSA said it uncovered evidence of investment advisers putting commissions ahead of their clients’ interests before, shortly afterward, announcing its intention to ban commission as a way of remunerating them. The protection market, however, escaped. In September 2010, before it had issued final guidance on its new client-led adviser charging rules, the regulator said advisers selling pure protection products could “continue to do so without having to ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes