The FSA's verdict on protection and the RDR is in. Graham Harvey examines the changes that will be needed as a result
The protection industry spent last year campaigning to keep protection out of the RDR. The main argument for this was that consumers were not unhappy with their advisers being remunerated by commission. It was a good case. Unlike some of the more complex financial products, the price consumers pay for protection is clear, lapsing a policy is clear because their cover simply ceases, and there are no unforeseen financial impacts such as Market Value Reductions. After consulting widely among the relevant parties, the FSA has reached the same conclusion. Its RDR consultation paper publ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes