Hugh Cutler says withdrawal rates aren't the problem when it comes to decumulation problems, it is, in fact, platform plumbing...
Discussions about sequencing risk in pension decumulation often miss a crucial point. And in doing so, advised clients are put at a disadvantage. Yes, there's merit in viewing sequencing risk purely as an asset allocation and withdrawal rate issue. But to my mind, there's a massive hole in this thinking. What's missing is whether a platform wrapper actually enables the end-client to draw from both income and capital, hold lower-correlation assets, and avoid any forced selling of liquid equities in drawdown. At the root of this is a plumbing problem for some platforms, when the...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes



