The continuing fall-out from the gating of the Woodford Equity Income fund should have advisers thinking hard about independence, technology and investment processes, writes Paul Miles
One of the things that has never sat right with me in financial advice has been the conflict of interests in the recommendation of funds by fund rating firms. Surely it is much better to use a firm that is truly independent and sits on the same side of the fence, ensuring there is no compromise in terms of product selection? Putting the client outcome and mandate first when selecting a fund gives the best probability of success. This ensures the fund is used as intended - based on a client mandate or outcome - as opposed to being selected based on relative peer group performance or a sta...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes