The two recent papers by the FSA - the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) and the Platforms Review - are linked but not in their script.
One talks about transparency in IFAs charging fees and the other talks about transparency in wrap providers. It seems very clear that both things need to be linked. A key concern I have is that there is a real conflict of interest and risk in wrap providers offering shares in their services. There are two reasons for this. First, the clients themselves may not know – it may be hidden in the small print. Secondly, the registered individuals may not even know that the owner of the business is collecting shares on their behalf. It needs to be asked, what values do those shares have now and...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes