Advisers are likely to have received guidance from life companies recently, advising them against se...
Advisers are likely to have received guidance from life companies recently, advising them against setting up a bare trust where a minor is named as the beneficiary. And they have reason to be confused. The latest guidance comes after life companies launched a raft of these products last year, in responses to changes to the Finance Act. When people were limited in the amount they could transfer to a discretionary trust, because of inheritance tax (IHT) implications, bare trusts were marketed as an alternative. So advisers are justified in wondering why the industry appears to have take...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes





