Nest and UBS cut five energy firms from portfolios

Nest sets 2025 carbon reduction target

Holly Roach
clock • 2 min read

Nest and UBS Asset Management have cut five energy firms they deem “unresponsive” from their portfolios.

UBS divested its holdings from Exxon Mobil, Imperial Oil, Kepco, Marathon Oil and Power Assets. The firm has applied these exclusions across its range of climate aware funds, including the one it manages for Nest, and its actively managed equity and fixed income sustainability funds. Nest has shared ownership in these five firms through its climate aware framework and the master trust said the five companies will not return to its main portfolio until they "demonstrate clear progress in preparing for the low carbon economy, in order to deliver good investment value for its savers". Ne...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Investment

PA Awards 2025: Why MyFolio Index came out top as Best Risk Targeted Range of Funds

PA Awards 2025: Why MyFolio Index came out top as Best Risk Targeted Range of Funds

Aberdeen Investments Senior Investment Director and Head of Managed & Model Solutions Justin Jones shares what sets MyFolio Index apart following its Best Risk Targeted Range of Funds award win at the Professional Adviser Awards 2025.

Professional Adviser
clock 19 August 2025 • 3 min read
Woodford IM hits back at FCA's enforcement action including £46m in fines

Woodford IM hits back at FCA's enforcement action including £46m in fines

WIM said it 'strongly disagrees' with the regulator's decision

Cristian Angeloni
clock 05 August 2025 • 3 min read
Regulator bans and fines Neil Woodford and Woodford IM £46m

Regulator bans and fines Neil Woodford and Woodford IM £46m

Woodford has appealed the decision to the Upper Tribunal

Cristian Angeloni
clock 05 August 2025 • 3 min read