The Financial Services Authority (FSA) is refusing to change the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) sub-classes, despite anger from advisers about having to pay for Keydata failure.
Under the existing system, advisers have had to contribute to compensating Keydata customers because claims which arose as a result of its marketing material fell within the investment intermediation sub-class. This was despite the widely-held view that Keydata was a product provider which designed and distributed structured investment products. In a consultation paper on a new funding model for the FSCS, the FSA detailed why it would keep the current classes. One alternative, which could save advisers payouts in the case of similar failures, would have been to separate out firms s...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes