'Time in' the market is better than 'timing'

clock

If you missed the best 40 trading days over the last 15 years, then you have missed out on some healthy profits - Fidelity says.

The investment management and services group says investors could even incur losses if they were not active on those days. Untouched, a £1,000 UK stock market investment in June 1992 would have been worth £4,612 at the end of June 2007. But take out the best 10 days and the investment would be worth £3,041, while stripping the best 40 days would me a return of just £1,304. The dangers are more evident in other European markets; missing the best 40 days in this same period would lead to losses in France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Sweden and the Netherlands. Fidelity UK managing directo...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Investment

Taking the rough with the smooth: How to navigate global market volatility

Taking the rough with the smooth: How to navigate global market volatility

'Like investing, smoothing isn't one-size-fits-all'

James Tothill
clock 13 June 2025 • 4 min read
Four key questions to guide informed investment decisions

Four key questions to guide informed investment decisions

Does the story make sense?

Gabriel Sacks
clock 12 June 2025 • 4 min read
Neil Woodford to charge up to £70 a month to access portfolio platform

Neil Woodford to charge up to £70 a month to access portfolio platform

W4.0 launches

Cristian Angeloni
clock 06 June 2025 • 2 min read