The Investment Management Association (IMA) has called for further consultation and analysis before the FSA publicly discloses further firm-specific information.
Responding to the FSA’s discussion paper ‘Transparency as a Regulatory Tool', the IMA says while transparency can be useful and is in line with Treating Customers Fairly, the value it will offer needs to be carefully balanced against cost and any unintended consequences. By proposing to publish information such as firm-specific complaints data and details on the use of its supervisory powers, the FSA runs the risk of publishing for publishing’s sake rather than achieving any real end for the consumer, according to the IMA. It also has specific concerns in relation to proposals to public...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes