The Association of IFAs (AIFA) is demanding the FSA re-think its capital adequacy proposals for personal investment firms (PIFs), arguing they could force more than a quarter of them to leave the industry.
In its response to the FSA's consultation paper, it says the regulator should cut the expenditure-based requirement (EBR) from 13 weeks to six, reduce the amount of capital firms need to hold from £20,000 to £15,000, and extend the transition period by two years to 2014. It adds the FSA should also consider an alternative 'counter-cyclical' capital arrangement, in which firms accrue capital during the good times so it is available in the bad. Additionally, it encourages the FSA to pursue Leaving Resources Behind (LRB), a concept it has considered but is undecided on, which is designed t...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes



