Should those with exclusions in income protection policies get a discount? Joan Coverson and Chris Ball explain the complexities
Current practice in the income protection (IP) market is to apply exclusions (rather than applying ratings) for specific impairments. This is commonly done because the risk of future claim for that impairment may be very high, such that it would be unrealistic to apply a monetary rating that would adequately cover the risk. To the customer, this approach is likely to appear unfair - they are getting reduced cover for the same price as someone getting full cover, so would it not be fairer to reduce their price? This is a practice that has been applied on critical illness contracts (for in...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes