Market views: Free cover limits on individual protection

clock

At a recent critical illness (CI) conference, it was observed that a lot of the individual market's underwriting problems could be reduced by using a low free cover limit (e.g. £50,000). Would bringing this into line with group business be helpful to you?

Peter Chadborn, Plan Money A common adviser frustration is that protection underwriting has got progressively stricter over recent years and this is a view we would concur with. This position is fuelled by the constant downward pressure on premiums by ill-informed price-driven advisers and aggregator sites, so something needs to reverse this trend and make transacting protection business more appealing. The obvious answer to this question is “Yes, of course”, but I’m not particularly confident this proposal will materialise. It seems to me that for every good idea the industry h...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Protection

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Aviva in high value protection proposition launch

Rising demand for IHT planning

Cameron Roberts
clock 25 August 2026 • 2 min read
Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

Advisers are changing their views on joint life cover

What represents true value for the client?

Alan Lakey
clock 11 August 2026 • 3 min read
Let's talk 'triple shock': Why the protection gap starts with three dangerous assumptions

Let's talk 'triple shock': Why the protection gap starts with three dangerous assumptions

Three assumptions keeping the protection gap alive

Graham Singleton
clock 28 July 2026 • 5 min read