The current compliance model is so established that it is rarely questioned, writes Brian Wagner. Here, he argues why it should be...
Across the financial advice industry, compliance is structured as a separate and retrospective function. Advice is given first, then checked afterwards through file reviews, periodic audits and sampled assessments. This model is so established that it is rarely questioned. It should be. The separation of advice from its assurance is a design choice, and it is one the industry now has the technology to reverse. One process, performed twice Consider what actually happens in an advice firm today. An adviser gathers a client's circumstances, assesses suitability, forms a recommendation...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes



