Tony Müdd argues that disengagement is not the cause of the protection gap, but a symptom of how the market operates...
At the Protection Distributors Group's (PDG) tenth anniversary, the Financial Conduct Authority's Ed Smith said the shock was not the protection gap. It was that so many people had never considered their needs. They were "not even at first base." There was, he said, "a real level of disengagement". He may be right, but what he is describing is a symptom, not a cause. Let's get real. A large protection gap is not new. It has outlived the Financial Services Authority, Retail Distribution Review (RDR), the Consumer Duty, several recessions, the smartphone, comparison sites, automated ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes



