Fraser Donaldson: Is multi-asset too expensive?

Paying for knowledge is fair

clock • 4 min read

Following the debate over whether multi-asset funds and portfolios are good value compared with other solutions designed to achieve the same outcomes, writes Fraser Donaldson, it is reasonable to put some historical perspective on these arguments. Rome was not built in a day and all that …

It seems to me there are three separate issues in this cost debate: value for money, who is charging for what and the old active vs passive argument. Multi-asset used to be called fund of funds. But they appear to have gone through a subtle rebranding over the last ten years. Initially there was scepticism over who was benefiting the most. Funds had a bid/offer spread starting at 5% but potentially rising to double figures. The charges were wrapped up in the bid/offer spread, with a hurdle to overcome before reaching profitability. In addition, the annual management charge was only pa...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Multi-Asset

Partner Insight: Multi-asset for all weather portfolios

Partner Insight: Multi-asset for all weather portfolios

Columbia Threadneedle Investments
clock 20 November 2025 • 1 min read
Partner Insight: Entering multi-asset's era

Partner Insight: Entering multi-asset's era

Columbia Threadneedle Investments
clock 18 November 2025 • 2 min read
Partner Insight: Weighing the risks and opportunities of Mag-7 dominance

Partner Insight: Weighing the risks and opportunities of Mag-7 dominance

The global stock market's concentration in a small number of mega-cap U.S. technology stocks, notably the Magnificent Seven, is raising systemic risk concerns among investors. While current valuations are high, they don't yet signal "irrational exuberance," says Paul Niven, Head of Multi-Asset Solutions, EMEA at Columbia Threadneedle Investments.

Columbia Threadneedle Investments
clock 22 October 2025 • 7 min read