Daniel Harrison, senior partner at True Potential, calls for more regulation on borrowing, but extra freedom for savers.
Without getting into a political debate, the Labour years stood for borrowing, at both a national and personal level. This filtered into all areas of society, including the way regulation was formulated and implemented. In simplistic terms, it became easier to borrow than to save. Mortgage regulation therefore had minimum intervention or oversight by any regulator, at all levels, which as an example, created the ability for clients to enter into potentially inappropriate contracts, such as using the equity in their own residential property to fund the leveraged acquisition of buy-to-let ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes