Close Asset Management to compensate client for unwanted ongoing advice

Client invested £25,000 through DFM service

clock • 2 min read

Close Asset Management has been ordered to compensate a client who was charged an ongoing advice fee after investing through the firm’s discretionary management service.

Mrs V, whose identity is confidential for privacy reasons, complained to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) claiming Close charged her for an advice service she did not want or need. In 2000, Mrs V invested £25,000 in a discretionary managed investment through Close and paid fees for the service, including an advice fee. Close Asset Management is the parent company of investment manager and advice firm Close Brothers Asset Management. Close wrote to the Mrs V last year to say that as it had not been able to arrange a review meeting with her over the past few years, it would assume ...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

FCA removes regulatory permissions from advice firm over breaches

FCA removes regulatory permissions from advice firm over breaches

Ups assets restriction and notes unpaid FOS award

Jen Frost
clock 22 December 2025 • 2 min read
 FCA chief: No allegations of Budget leak market abuse so far

FCA chief: No allegations of Budget leak market abuse so far

Told MPs on the Treasury Committee the leak caused serious concern

Alex Sebastian
clock 16 December 2025 • 3 min read
FCA's non-financial misconduct rules 'opaque' over social media activity

FCA's non-financial misconduct rules 'opaque' over social media activity

Lack of definitions and case studies

Cristian Angeloni
clock 16 December 2025 • 2 min read