Close Asset Management to compensate client for unwanted ongoing advice

Client invested £25,000 through DFM service

clock • 2 min read

Close Asset Management has been ordered to compensate a client who was charged an ongoing advice fee after investing through the firm’s discretionary management service.

Mrs V, whose identity is confidential for privacy reasons, complained to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) claiming Close charged her for an advice service she did not want or need. In 2000, Mrs V invested £25,000 in a discretionary managed investment through Close and paid fees for the service, including an advice fee. Close Asset Management is the parent company of investment manager and advice firm Close Brothers Asset Management. Close wrote to the Mrs V last year to say that as it had not been able to arrange a review meeting with her over the past few years, it would assume ...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Appointed representatives: Are you really in control of the risks?

Appointed representatives: Are you really in control of the risks?

'The FCA doesn't just want oversight, it wants evidence'

Paul Bruns
clock 06 October 2026 • 7 min read
Manchester City charges: Treasury Committee chair raises tax questions with HMRC

Manchester City charges: Treasury Committee chair raises tax questions with HMRC

As Tax Policy Associates points to potential £12m in unpaid tax

Jen Frost
clock 02 October 2026 • 2 min read
'Waiting for certainty can itself create the breach': When must a firm notify the FCA?

'Waiting for certainty can itself create the breach': When must a firm notify the FCA?

'A voicemail is unlikely to suffice'

Gareth Fatchett
clock 02 October 2026 • 5 min read