SJP to pay £54,000 compensation to sons of deceased clients

Adviser recommended products before death

clock • 2 min read

St James’s Place (SJP) has paid £54,000 in total to the sons of a deceased couple who received financial advice in the lead up to their death, the ombudsman has found.

Mr and Mrs E, as referred to by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), had their portfolio reviewed by SJP in 2007, when the firm recommended a second whole of life (WoL) policy, an investment bond and two trustee bonds. Mr and Mrs E died in 2012 in 2014 respectively, after which their sons, as the executors of their parents' estate, complained to SJP about its advice. In 2016 SJP made an initial offer of compensation to the pair, which it lifted in April 2018 to £54,000. The sons were unhappy with the amount offered and referred the complaint to the ombudsman. In the interim SJP paid...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

Appointed representatives: Are you really in control of the risks?

Appointed representatives: Are you really in control of the risks?

'The FCA doesn't just want oversight, it wants evidence'

Paul Bruns
clock 06 October 2026 • 7 min read
Manchester City charges: Treasury Committee chair raises tax questions with HMRC

Manchester City charges: Treasury Committee chair raises tax questions with HMRC

As Tax Policy Associates points to potential £12m in unpaid tax

Jen Frost
clock 02 October 2026 • 2 min read
'Waiting for certainty can itself create the breach': When must a firm notify the FCA?

'Waiting for certainty can itself create the breach': When must a firm notify the FCA?

'A voicemail is unlikely to suffice'

Gareth Fatchett
clock 02 October 2026 • 5 min read