Investors ditch brand for price and simplicity in robo-adviser selection, research

Just 4% opt for branding

Victoria McKeever
clock • 2 min read

Investors are more likely to choose a robo-adviser based on its price and ease of use, rather than on brand, a survey from Legg Mason has found.

According to the findings a mere 4% of investors said brand would have the most influence on their choice of robo-adviser. In contrast, more than a fifth (22%) opted for price or fees and 17% said ease of use would be the most important consideration in their selection. Third on the list was fee transparency, with 8% citing this as the most important factor. Lack of fee transparency had previously been highlighted as an issue by Boring Money. It reported just one of the 15 consumers tested could calculate the cost of investing £1,000, concluding robo-advisers were using over-complicat...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Investment

Four reasons why direct engagement can still make a difference

Four reasons why direct engagement can still make a difference

'Quantitative data arguably tells only half the story'

Simon Wood
clock 05 March 2026 • 4 min read
Darius McDermott: Is income under pressure?

Darius McDermott: Is income under pressure?

‘The period of abundant income is ebbing'

Darius McDermott
clock 04 March 2026 • 5 min read
Investors told 'hold your nerve' as Iran strikes drive volatility

Investors told 'hold your nerve' as Iran strikes drive volatility

Ongoing conflict impact

Linus Uhlig
clock 02 March 2026 • 3 min read