ABI hits out at new proposals for funding FSCS

Calls for “fair and proportionate” levy

Hannah Godfrey
clock • 2 min read

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has spoken out against a "blurring of responsibilities" following proposals product providers pay additional contributions to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).

On 14 December, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published proposals that product providers pay additional contributions to the FSCS to ease the cost on advice firms. The regulator said it recognised the burden of funding the FSCS did not currently fall equally on product providers and advisers. ABI director of regulation Hugh Savill said: "We see no justification for the blurring of responsibilities in this way. We will be engaged fully in the consultation, with a focus on challenging the rationale behind this idea." And ABI head of conduct regulation James Bridge said he did no...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Regulation

FCA warns on loan notes and mini-bond investment risks

FCA warns on loan notes and mini-bond investment risks

Urges consumers to be wary of high-risk investments

Jenna Brown
clock 20 August 2026 • 2 min read
SVS Securities CEO banned and fined

SVS Securities CEO banned and fined

Demetrios Hadjigeorgiou barred from working in senior management positions

Jenna Brown
clock 20 August 2026 • 2 min read
Suitability rules overhaul: Why firms should engage now, not later

Suitability rules overhaul: Why firms should engage now, not later

'The bigger shift is philosophical, not just structural'

Marjolaine Quirke
clock 19 August 2026 • 3 min read