Firms must review Holloway plans annually to satisfy RDR exemption

clock

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has clarified the conditions firms need to meet to qualify for an exemption from the Retail Distribution Review's (RDR's) adviser charging and professionalism requirements when selling income protection products with an investment element.

After fierce lobbying from mutuals, the FSA agreed to exempt advised sales of Holloway plans from the RDR, but only if the investment element was not significant. The FSA has defined 'not significant' as where the projected maturity value contained in the key features illustration is 20% or less of accumulated premiums. Originally, the investment part of the products meant IFAs would have been forced to charge a fee for advising on them after 2012. But, as Holloway plans are targeted at lower-paid blue collar workers who otherwise struggle to get cover, the mutuals argued this woul...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better
RDR

RDR ten years on: An advice industry changed for the better

'The end of the advice industry as we know it'

Kevin Silvester
clock 08 February 2023 • 2 min read
RDR

Deja vu: Are we heading back to the future on commission?

Marty, fire up the DeLorean

Tim Sargisson
clock 13 January 2016 • 3 min read
RDR

Blog: How can we shrink the advice gap?

The advice gap has been a popular topic since the Retail Distribution Review, but hasn't this gap always existed?

clock 02 November 2015 •