Which? has criticised the abolition of RU64 as a "huge mistake" despite widespread industry support for the move.
Responses to the Financial Services Authority (FSA) consultation on RU64 are due in by this Friday but there seems to be a degree of polarisation between pension providers who on the whole seem supportive of the plan, and Which? formerly known as the Consumer Association, which believes the abolition of the rule would be detrimental to consumers. Mick McAteer, principal policy adviser at Which, says: “We believe the RU64 rule has made competition work in the industry along with stamping out mis-selling and promoting stakeholder pensions. For the FSA to remove it when the market is not wor...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes